Thought I'd write you today..
Here's an example of a posted conversation
I carry on with members in one of my favored
groups.
Remember, I'm talking with persons of varied
mindsets.
To the group Polysinthenewmillenium:


Here's an exercise in definition:

(1) Can one be both polyamorous and homosexual?

I'm thinking ..
homosexuality - denotes the type of person who just
cannot relate 'intimately' with persons of the
opposite sex; ones who may not necessarily "have
anything against" others opposite their genre,
nevertheless unable to carry on a productive personal
relationship.

In much the same way ..
monogamy - denotes the type of persons persuing a
relationship that excludes intimate productive
personal relationships with others considered as
outside their immediate circle, clic, or network.

Wherein it appears that ..
swing relationships - tend to be lacking in nurture
and caring, as participants predominantly seek out
moreso 'self(ish)-based' forms of satisfaction. i.e.
The girl or guy who somehow becomes leftover fodder at
the party after their so called 'peoples' have fled
the scene.

As I envision it ..
persons seeking 'polyamory' pursue the ways and
dictates of love as the only viable forum. Man-made
rules and bounds are rarely considered weighty, as
"love never fails" in every circumstance.
(* See - defining true)
Connectability to ports of intimate comeradery and
activity are readily available, but rarely left open
for abuse as one would love 'self' enough to not allow
for compromises.
This style of living acts as an identifying factor of
persons who prove to be acceptable to a 'commonality
of sentience' that extends from here to the infinite
META realms.

(2) defining 'true' as in the sense of 'true love'.

In itself, the term "true" comes to represent a
defining quality; rigid and unyeilding, forming bounds
of demarkation and standards; as a level, or a
measuring stick, or a datum reference.

In my opinion ..
Love can only be considered as 'true' to itself alone.
It is as to say - that to us, there is no such thing
as 'true love'.
Love is not rigid, it is flexible, adjusts to
circumstance, and is impartial to sentiment.
It is not interested in being manipulated as a
'control element' (scientific def.); 'it shall prove
to be what it shall prove to be'.

Some purport to 'teach commands of men as doctrine' by
strongly intimating what one should do with and within
their personal lives. This is an offense to that
soverign 'Spirit' which is eggregiously overlooked
often.
.. oops! started preachin' ..
Any responses to points 1&2?
Mac

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:34:34 -0000
From: "mac&tia"
Subject: U



"Just, U"

You know, U just thinkin' of me
tells someone that you care.
One; who exists as 'larger than life'
someone, no one sees - there.

The message moves past and through me,
channels throught the air,
through space time and dimension -
reaching a 'cognizance' that we all certainly, commonly
share.

Simply, a positive sentiment
genuine in its own 'touch'
has the strength to conjure creation;
which is why there exists so much.

You know, U just thinkin' of me
makes for magic, makes for spells.
Something so minute, inconsequential;
possessant of such profound power,
can't U tell?


By inspiration of Syll.

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:46:23 -0000
From: "mac&tia"
Subject: been around the world..


Hey Mich and All!

Been enjoying surfing the internet for subcultures to the poly
community. I find that many person; some male, mostly female; like to
classify themselves as bi. I take it as in indication that they have
hearts that prefer more open styles of love, which in essence
correlates with the polyamory concept.
I don't think think we as people should be judged by the relationships
we pursue. That judgement is best left up to the individual, as
resulting outcomes speak for themselves.
I've seen lovely people who classify themselves as 'swingers', but
meet regulary with one another as extended family. The varied
grouping acronyms seem now to be blending as 'tribes' are now being
formed that hold responsibility to themselves. Barriers of race and
religion are being overcome through genuine acts of love.
There are the types of swingers, though, that get mad when they
realize that their intended marks won't just rub up against
any-old-thing! And some still prefer acts that perpetuate and mock
cruelties. There will always exist a preference threshold.
I think multifaceted love is finding its separation from the
blanketing label known as 'sin'.
Poly Conventions coming up in Fla soon! I need to plan to get out
more!
Mac

Course of Act

Greetings!


I'm new to the blog scene, so bear with me until I get acclimated...


I think I'll start out using searchable links to my first publishing endeavor, Course of Act; ISBN#0-595-32158-5; iUniverse.com and bn.com.

Please be sure to read through

The Reality of Amalgamated Forces, as it stands as a prelude to the published title.

macdaddyx1